Q. Thinking about the issue of asylum seekers arriving in Australia by boat, which of the following alternatives do you think is the best way to process those arriving:

Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens 50% or more About 25% About 10% About 5% 1% or less
Offshore, in any other country 11% 17% 11% 5% 17% 12% 10% 8% 9%
Offshore, but only in a country where human rights are protected 31% 31% 37% 25% 27% 41% 36% 40% 30%
Onshore (in Australia) 21% 24% 11% 58% 4% 7% 19% 27% 42%
Turn the boats around 28% 21% 36% 6% 51% 39% 30% 23% 15%
Don’t know 9% 8% 6% 6% 1% 1% 5% 3% 4%

The most favoured method of processing asylum seekers was ‘offshore, but only in a country where human rights are protected’ (31%), followed by ‘turn the boats around’ (28%).

Respondents then favour processing ‘onshore in Australia’ (21%) over processing asylum seekers ‘offshore in any other country’ (11%).

Coalition voters are more likely to prefer processing asylum seekers offshore where human rights are protected (37%), as well as turning the boats around (36%).

Greens voters are much more likely to prefer onshore processing in Australia (58%).  Labor voters are more likely to prefer processing offshore in any other country (17%) and somewhat more likely to prefer processing ‘onshore in Australia’ (24%).

Respondents that believe the proportion of boat arrivals constitute ‘50% or more’ of the annual immigration intake are far more likely to favour ‘turning the boats around’ (51%).

Conversely, respondents that believe the proportion to be ‘1% or less’ are far more likely to be in favour of processing onshore in Australia (42%).

Essential Report

Two Party Preferred: 05 March 12

Labor
44+/- 0
Coalition

56+/- 0

Subscribe Now

Subscribe to receive the Essential Report
in your email each week

 
Essential Report

Search the Essential Report

Categories

Essential Tags

Comments